January 12, 2013

dizzzynoodles:

homocomingqueen:

toxic behaviors I’ve been seeing from a ton of folks, lately:

  • picking fights solely to pick fights and disguising it with academic jargon
  • so much abuser logic and abuser tactics
  • only wanting to hang out to talk shit on other friends and expecting validation for that
  • talking about nothing but oppressions you don’t face and getting inappropriately angry
  • talking about nothing but shared oppression to people who’ve made it clear they don’t want to hear about it/are triggered by it

like, if see yourself reflected here, knock that shit off. and don’t talk to me about it ‘cause my heart will explode.

important

“only wanting to hang out to talk shit on other friends and expecting validation for that”

SERIOUSLY

least favorite thing

(via jizzzyrichardpignoodles)

December 15, 2012
"The average prison sentence for men who kill their intimate partners is 2 to 6 years. Women who kill their partners are sentenced, on average, to 15 years.17 A pair of Maryland cases vividly illustrates this inequality in sentencing.18 In one case, a judge in Baltimore County, Maryland sentenced Kenneth Peacock to 18 months for killing his unfaithful wife. The very next day, another judge in the same county sentenced Patricia Ann Hawkins to three years in prison for killing her abusive husband. Significantly, the prosecutor in the Peacock case requested a sentence twice as long as the one imposed, while the prosecutor in the Hawkins case requested one-third of the sentence imposed."

The Michigan Women’s Justice & Clemency Project (via illegalplumpudding)

“As many as 90% of the women in prison today [2008] for killing men had been battered by those men.15

(via bananapeppers)

Another reason the argument that Kasandra Perkins should have had a gun to protect herself falls flat. 

(via jessicavalenti)

Heres the reblog . I was speaking off. Like I said you’re not on my follow list if I don’t respect that you care about this . But there is something so ENRAGING about the fact that se latches on after I remember  blogging this when it had 22 reblogs and IPP was digging in the crates and making all of this analysis AND THERE WAS NOTHING NOTHING  but from  people who USUALLY reblog this ( “SJ” tumblr. When it’s like 200 and no media attention

The reblog about teh questions we nee dto ask.

The women who are in the clink over this.

NOTHING

but 6’000 notes and she has an argument for her Nation buddies.

OVER THIS WOMANS DEAD BODY

ACTUALLY TRULY AND LITERALLY 

LIKE IN TEH WORDS STANDING WITH ONE FOOT ON A CORPSE AND TEH OTHER ON SOMEONES CELL

She has never once been or showed actually compassion to women going through this except as a rhetorical device . And to knwo that she gets applause for CLICKING A FUCKING BUTTON 

on teh work IPP did 

or doing a two second summery of how Karn nearly died 

Jesus I 

JESUS

(via blackamazon)

This is why so many woc have zero fucks to give about “mainstream” feminist bloggers and their published writing.

(via deluxvivens)

(via fromonesurvivortoanother)

December 13, 2012
transpondster:

Stanley Kubrick, Sue Lyon, Vladimir Nabokov, and James Mason at the premiere of “Lolita”.
Taken from a phenomenal iPhone / iPad app offered by the L. A. County Museum of Art (LACMA).
The app is available at: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/kubrick/id576358629

transpondster:

Stanley Kubrick, Sue Lyon, Vladimir Nabokov, and James Mason at the premiere of “Lolita”.

Taken from a phenomenal iPhone / iPad app offered by the L. A. County Museum of Art (LACMA).

The app is available at: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/kubrick/id576358629

(via sillylittlecaucasiangirl)

December 4, 2012
Oh my god here we go

crown-of-weeds:

You know what? Fine. Let’s talk about ABA.

Let’s talk about the Effeminate Boys Project.

Let’s talk about electrifying the floors.

Let’s talk about starving and electrocuting disabled children.

Let’s talk about screams, slaps, and love.

Let’s talk about robbing people of their language.

Let’s talk about robbing people of their ability to learn.

Let’s talk about forty hours of week of systematic abuse.

Let’s talk about the Judge Rotenberg Center.

Let’s talk about holding my hands down in glue, let’s talk about my boss who passes behind closed doors, let’s talk about all the kids I know who can’t say no.

Let’s talk about how this is best fucking practice, mandated by insurance, based on science shenanigans so bad it belongs in fandom_wank, and if you love your kids, you will do this to them.

Let’s fucking talk about ABA.

(via neednothavehappenedtobetrue)

November 26, 2012

(Source: raineceleste, via fromonesurvivortoanother)

November 20, 2012
Reason #126: The Perks of Being a Wallflower

fromonesurvivortoanother:

morereasonsyoushouldntfuckkids:

[trigger warning: child sexual abuse]

I really like the perks of being a wallflower but today I realized—

a significant part of its success is because it is ugly, but not too ugly about child sexual abuse.

like I understand that a large chunk of the csa storyline is rarely said directly, only implied, so that the reader can connect the dots at the big reveal at the end.

but this literary decision also has the effect of giving us basically nothing about how completely terrible Charlie’s experience was.

we are given this message that Charlie has fond feelings for his abuser, not conflicted or even some reasonable semblance of anger.

Charlie is this polite, docile survivor who has crises but never acts out too much. he is never too loud or too angry or too bitter. someow he maintains this perfect, unblemished idealism even as he starts to figure out how fucked up things really were.

we get this nice, full circle story that resolves itself and makes the reader believe that Charlie is going to be okay, precisely marketed so as to not offend a broad audience with how ugly and disgusting and terrible child sexual abuse actually is. instead, this hipster kid “coming-of-age” oh-look-i-made-a-cd-with-the-smiths-on-it bullshit overshadows everything.

and indeed, growing up, basically all the kids my age who read this book never once mentioned child sexual abuse or rape. this book let privileged white kids feel “less alone” but it didn’t make anyone angry and make them want to change things for the better. it’s an apolitical text that gives people warm fuzzies with a child sexual abuse plot point as a tacked on afterthought for better marketing.

no seriously I can’t believe I didn’t realize this until now.

fuck this book and the pretending bullshit it is. it meant a lot to me as a kid. it did. it helped me feel less alone. but it offered very little guidance. it barely even tells the reader that what happened is not okay. in fact, it even normalizes it a little and casts it in this nostalgic, rose-colored haze. that alone is fucking dangerous and unacceptable.

you might say it’s only one book but do you know how many realistic, insightful, and well-written texts there are about child sexual abuse? barely a handful. out of the sea of books I read as a kid, only one book of 100000 others ever tackled this topic— Speak. one single book.

so when another single book becomes elevated in the way this one has, and its message is half-assed and possibly dismissive…that is not okay. that is the mass market yet again deciding that the concerns of survivors matter less than everyone else. that is our very ugly and horrible experiences being compressed and sanitized so that people can read about what happened to us and even enjoy it vicariously in a fucked up voyeuristic way.

I mean I am talking about things so horrible that when non-survivors hear about them they fuckin puke up their guts. but I’m not even asking for a book to delve into that darkest of darkness. I’m just asking for a book that doesn’t happily tie together the story as if everything is going to be okay, because it rarely is.

I’m asking for a book that is about child sexual abuse that is written for survivors, not written with us as a tertiary concern. because if I’d had a book like Bastard Out of Carolina when I was twelve then maybe it wouldn’t have taken me five more years before I could even name my experience as child sexual abuse. yes, it took me that long because there is such an immense absence of this type of content available for people that you pretty much have to get lucky. this book could have been one desperately needed text to fill a little place in that void, but instead it became just another book written for everyone except people like me.

fuck this. this book is bullshit.

Someone on my dash posted about how they hated this book and it was horrible for them. So I thought about it and I realized yes, it is pretty fuckin awful. 

I really can’t believe I didn’t get this until now. But it makes sense— I was so lost and so desperate for something, anything, that even the little crumbs this book tossed me gave me reason to lift it up on a pedestal. 

YES

YES

YEP

YEP

YES

November 7, 2012

superherotoranse:

mattachinereview reblogged your post: I’m watching the Jimmy Kimmel thing about the parents eating telling the kids they ate their candy. I personally do not find it funny. I find it fucking horrifying.

THESE THINGS ALWAYS MAKE ME SO UNCOMFORTABLE jesus being a kid is terrifying

Seriously. Being a kid is about trust because you have nothing else to rely on but the family around you to tell you who you are and what the world is.

And when people use that trust to play games to laugh at a kid when they, you know, ACT LIKE A TRUSTING KID, it just feels so fucked up.

Like, I just wanna be like OKAY IN RETURN I’M GOING TO DO THE MOST CONVINCING GOD-SPEAKING ACT YOU HAVE EVER SEEN AND CONVINCE YOU THAT YOU’RE GOING TO HELL. BUT HO-HO IT’S A JOKE WASN’T THAT FUNNY.

No. It’s not. It’s fucked up.

11:37pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZAAEXwWrJ9tq
  
Filed under: tw: abuse children 
November 7, 2012
I’m watching the Jimmy Kimmel thing about the parents eating telling the kids they ate their candy. I personally do not find it funny. I find it fucking horrifying.

superherotoranse:

goldenheartedrose:

spastasmagoria:

To have fun at your kid’s expense like that? To break their trust, and to break their sense of expectation—they got all that candy and they expect to be able to eat their candy—they’re incredibly disappointed. 

My husband’s like… wow, all those brats, a couple of them were raised right… and I’m like… no, if that had been me I would have lost it. I would have been incredibly wounded that my parents had done that to me. I would have been wounded that they took something that was mine without regard to my feeling, then when I found out it was a joke, I would be wounded that they’d do something like that to me. 

I hate practical jokes. I hate things that make people feel bad. I hate being the butt of them, and I hate watching them perpetrated on others.  I hate seeing caps on my dash of this video, and I hate that I was made to watch it. And I’m sure people are going to be like oh… you’re being overly sensitive, it’s all in good fun, etc. But I think that was really potentially damaging. Yeah, it’s just candy, whatever, but it’s not about candy. Not getting the candy you thought you were going to have IS disappointing. But it’s about trust. 

I’m 100% with you on this (no surprise there).  

I knwo things like this are meant to be funny.  I know that.  I don’t get how people can be that cruel, though.  It just breaks my heart to see my kids cry, and I don’t know how parents can do that to their own kids.

Story time! So if you’ve followed me on Tumblr for very long, you’ve probably heard this story.  But basically, when I was 13 years old, my parents convinced me that there was a difference between regular nail polish and toe nail polish, and that there would be drastic consequences (though I can’t remember if they specified or just said that “bad things would happen”) to using regular nail polish on your toenails from that point forward.  My parents STILL tell that story as a “hahaha, look how funny that was”.  They don’t get that it was incredibly hurtful and terrifying for me.  They don’t get that I cannot read sarcasm and I had no idea they were trying to tease me, and I was taking it seriously.

Same. And I think it says something about our society on a broader level - something about how we think the intentions of a person should carry more weight than their effects.

Some people like being pranked and practical joked. But the key is to actually find that out before you do something, and with kids you don’t even know.

THESE THINGS ALWAYS MAKE ME SO UNCOMFORTABLE

jesus being a kid is terrifying

(Source: deducecanoe)

October 26, 2012
Adulthood

amydentata:

I don't really know what adult 'me' looks like.

Am I growing in a cocoon or shutting myself out? What image would I even empathize with?

What do I feel like as an adult? I can describe childhood feelings so well... adult feelings are grey goo. Adulthood is more of an idea than reality most of the time. I can't keep up.

Next to others my age, I feel so small. Maybe I just have to build what I can, with what I've got, no matter how small.

(original post)

October 20, 2012

superherotoranse:

So Taylor and I made this thing.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »